首页
VPS优惠码(更新ing)
美国VPS主机推荐
精选便宜VPS
其它便宜VPS
便宜服务器
VPS代购
关于
English
更多
VPS优惠码(更新ing)
美国VPS主机推荐
精选便宜VPS
其它便宜VPS
便宜服务器
VPS代购
关于
English
Search
1
搬瓦工:CN2线路VPS年付46.7美元起,2.5-10Gbps带宽CN2 GIA线路季付46.7美元起
13,013 阅读
2
免费试用4小时的VPN
10,577 阅读
3
多国免费代理—飞迅VPN代理FXvpn
5,810 阅读
4
DediPath:Memorial Day全场VPS五折年付10美元起,洛杉矶独立服务器月付39美元起
4,986 阅读
5
3D肉蒲团之极乐宝鉴
3,350 阅读
VPS优惠动态
VPS推荐
VPS指南/教程
VPS评测
独立服务器
免费空间
域名相关
其它
软件相关
Search
标签搜索
KVM
洛杉矶
OpenVZ
XEN
香港VPS
洛杉矶VPS
日本VPS
便宜服务器
圣何塞
凤凰城
达拉斯
高防VPS
西雅图
CN2 GIA
香港CN2
80VPS
支持支付宝
CN2
洛杉矶MC
新加坡VPS
VPSok
累计撰写
6,871
篇文章
累计收到
15
条评论
首页
栏目
VPS优惠动态
VPS推荐
VPS指南/教程
VPS评测
独立服务器
免费空间
域名相关
其它
软件相关
页面
VPS优惠码(更新ing)
美国VPS主机推荐
精选便宜VPS
其它便宜VPS
便宜服务器
VPS代购
关于
English
搜索到
22
篇与
新泽西
的结果
2012-08-17
GreenyHosting:$6.48/首月XEN-512MB/30GB/1000GB 凤凰城&新泽西
GreenyHosting是一家国外主机商,注册自2009年,提供虚拟主机,分销主机,VPS等产品,数据中心在凤凰城或者新泽西州。目前,主机商上架了基于XEN PV架构VPS产品,并提供首月五折优惠码给大家体验他们的产品。 下面我们一起来看看512MB内存的一款XEN VPS信息(首月6.48美元,续费$12.95/月)。CPU:4 cores 内存:512MB SWAP:512MB 硬盘:30GB 月流量:1000GB 1 IP/SolusVM优惠码:GOXEN 测试IP:184.171.165.131(凤凰城) 108.61.34.251(新泽西) 【购买连接】https://my.greenyhosting.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=18 GreenyHosting提供的凤凰城是PhoenixNAP机房,而新泽西则是NET2EZ机房,当然大家也可以选择最低配置的256MB产品,首月仅3.48美元。主机商很是了解我们想要了解的信息,在WHT的介绍页面,专门放了他们自己测试的结果,刚好,好VPS就偷懒,直接复制:凤凰城测试LOCATION : Phoenix, AZPLAN NAME : XEN-512MDISK TEST[root@vps test]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync16384+0 records in16384+0 records out1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 5.03224 s, 213 MB/sCACHEFLY SPEEDTEST[root@vps test]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test–2012-08-16 00:10:11– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.testResolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OKLength: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]Saving to: `100mb.test’100%[====================================================================================================================>] 104,857,600 33.9M/s in 3.0s2012-08-16 00:10:14 (33.9 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]BENCHMARK RESULTS======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: vps.hostname.com: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-220.23.1.el6.i686 — #1 SMP Mon Jun 18 16:56:21 BST 2012 Machine: i686 (i386) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT 00:11:08 up 38 days, 16:12, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.12, 0.05; runlevel 3————————————————————————Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 16 2012 00:11:08 – 00:39:174 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 24662800.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 3140.8 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 2115.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 448912.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 115233.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1287040.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 686738.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 72494.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 3618.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4368.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1371.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 708375.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 24662800.6 2113.4Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3140.8 571.1Execl Throughput 43.0 2115.8 492.0File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 448912.3 1133.6File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 115233.5 696.3File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1287040.1 2219.0Pipe Throughput 12440.0 686738.8 552.0Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 72494.8 181.2Process Creation 126.0 3618.1 287.2Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4368.9 1030.4Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1371.6 2286.0System Call Overhead 15000.0 708375.5 472.3 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 753.0————————————————————————Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 16 2012 00:39:17 – 01:07:264 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 98949800.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 12567.5 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 7324.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 611025.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 161091.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2049514.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 2718027.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 283683.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 11462.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11217.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1513.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 2685222.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 98949800.0 8479.0Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12567.5 2285.0Execl Throughput 43.0 7324.9 1703.5File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 611025.8 1543.0File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 161091.8 973.4File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2049514.8 3533.6Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2718027.2 2184.9Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 283683.6 709.2Process Creation 126.0 11462.8 909.7Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11217.6 2645.7Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1513.9 2523.1System Call Overhead 15000.0 2685222.0 1790.1 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 1946.1新泽西测试LOCATION : Piscataway, NJPLAN : XEN-512MDISK TESTroot@nyc-main:/home/test# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync16384+0 records in16384+0 records out1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 4.8823 s, 220 MB/sCACHEFLY SPEEDTESTroot@nyc-main:/home/test# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test–2012-08-16 19:07:48– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.testResolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OKLength: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]Saving to: `100mb.test’100%[==============================================================================>] 104,857,600 11.3M/s in 8.9s2012-08-16 19:07:57 (11.3 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]BENCHMARK RESULTS======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2) System: vps.hostname.com: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-220.el6.i686 — #1 SMP Tue Dec 6 16:15:40 GMT 2011 Machine: i686 (i386) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT 15:45:03 up 12 min, 1 user, load average: 0.10, 0.10, 0.08; runlevel 3————————————————————————Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 16 2012 15:45:03 – 16:13:124 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 24745519.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 3142.4 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 2179.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 442621.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 113355.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1397048.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 636735.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 78995.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 3697.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4400.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1382.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 707661.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 24745519.4 2120.4Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3142.4 571.4Execl Throughput 43.0 2179.6 506.9File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 442621.2 1117.7File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 113355.7 684.9File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1397048.3 2408.7Pipe Throughput 12440.0 636735.5 511.8Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 78995.0 197.5Process Creation 126.0 3697.1 293.4Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4400.3 1037.8Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1382.7 2304.6System Call Overhead 15000.0 707661.0 471.8 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 761.3————————————————————————Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 16 2012 16:13:12 – 16:41:204 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables 98767172.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone 12568.3 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput 7502.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 604726.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 154409.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2137898.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput 2535895.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching 309999.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation 11687.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11308.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1518.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead 2691400.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 98767172.3 8463.3Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12568.3 2285.2Execl Throughput 43.0 7502.4 1744.7File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 604726.2 1527.1File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 154409.4 933.0File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2137898.8 3686.0Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2535895.4 2038.5Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 309999.8 775.0Process Creation 126.0 11687.9 927.6Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11308.4 2667.1Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1518.1 2530.2System Call Overhead 15000.0 2691400.2 1794.3 ========System Benchmarks Index Score 1956.4
2012年08月17日
1,761 阅读
0 评论
76 点赞
2012-05-07
TailoredVPS:$3.47/月OpenVZ-256MB/384MB/30GB/500GB 新泽西
TailoredVPS是一家2011年2月成立的VPS主机商,当时推出过首月1.24美元的VPS,好VPS部落也分享和测试过,东西还不错。在1年多之后,再次提及他下,主机商在WHT发布一些优惠信息,官方的优惠码是差不多八折吧,不过,好VPS试了下,该主机商去年曾经给我的一个特别优惠码终身七折目前仍然有效,使用后每月仅需3.47美元。 下面我们看看这款VPS的简单配置。CPU:1 cores 内存:256MB 突发内存:384MB 硬盘:30GB 月流量:500GB 1 IP/SolusVM优惠码:ZRBLOG(终身七折) MAY2012(终身八折) 【购买链接】https://secure.tailoredvps.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=1 TailoredVPS提供的VPS数据中心在新泽西州,基于OpenVZ架构,国内访问速度较一般,抽风少,应该跟达拉斯差不多吧。如果大家需要了解更多详细的情形,可以看这里:tailoredvps便宜VPS简单测试
2012年05月07日
2,386 阅读
0 评论
21 点赞
2012-03-01
Cloudstra:$1/首月-256MB/10GB/200GB 新泽西
Cloudstra是一家美国主机商,域名注册自2010年,如果一直从事IDC业务的话,也超过1年了。不过,官方提供的VPS价格可不低,一款256MB的产品月付高达20美元,说他坑爹都不为过!你也许会问:好VPS,你为啥给俺们分享这坑爹信息?表着急,现在,有一个首月只需要1美元的优惠码,折腾练手,那是再好不过滴! 首先,我们来看看这款VPS的配置。CPU:1 core 内存:256MB SWAP:1GB 硬盘:10GB(实际为9GB,系统已分1GB做SWAP) 月流量:200GB(100Mbps) 1 IP/Cloud面板【优惠码】TESTCLOUD 【购买地址】https://cumulus.cloudstra.com/index.php?/cart&action=add&id=21&cat_id=3 Cloudstra介绍他们的产品是基于真正的云,至于是白云还是乌云,我就不清楚咯。不过,这次可以1美元帮他们测试云,这倒是真的,VPS即时开通,支持PalPal支付。云VPS的管理界面,与我们之前分享的Host1Plus相近,都是号称云(Cloud)。机房在新泽西,没看到测试IP,还是花1美元买个试试吧。
2012年03月01日
1,425 阅读
0 评论
21 点赞
2011-10-18
ArabicaHosting:$4.5/月 512MB/1.2GB/40GB/500GB 新泽西
ArabicaHosting是一个非常年轻的主机商,提供虚拟主机,VPS等网络产品,数据中心位于美国新泽西州。关注这个主机商源于他在LEB发布的一个优惠信息:可使用50%终身优惠码购买任意一款VPS产品。优惠后的产品配置+价格就比较给力的了。 我们来看看一款512MB内存的OpenVZ产品,他的配置为: 内存:512MB 突发内存:1280MB(订购页面显示768MB) 硬盘:40GB 月流量:500GB 1 IP/SolusVM 【优惠码】LOWENDBOX 【购买链接】http://arabicahosting.com/account/order.php?step=1&productGroup=3&product=8 主机商提供了一个 测试IP地址:99.192.245.102,大家可以自行测试下,不过主机商域名注册于一个月前,这不由得令人担忧,这么低的价格又却是诱人,令人纠结,愿做先行者的朋友上吧!
2011年10月18日
1,083 阅读
0 评论
45 点赞
1
2